Search: Web        
powered by
Paul Giblin on Politics ~

Archive for the 'Surveys, polls and guesses' Category

John McCain’s fate swings with idependents in Arizona

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 by Paul Giblin

John McCain

Presidential candidate John McCain leads opponents Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in hypothetical head-to-head contests among Arizona voters, according to a Rocky Mountain Poll released today, Thursday, May 22.

In a McCain-Obama match-up, the Republican senator from Arizona has an 11-percentage point edge against the Democratic senator from Illinois. The results: McCain 50 percent, Obama 39 percent, and undecided 11 percent.

In a McCain-Clinton election, McCain has an even greater 15-percentage point advantage against the Democratic senator from New York. The specifics: McCain 51 percent, Clinton 36 percent, undecided 11 percent, and someone else 1 percent. 

Survey director Earl de Berge noted that the election is shaping up to be intensely partisan with 84 percent or more Republicans siding with McCain against either Democratic challenger; and conversely, 70 percent or more Democrats close ranks and align with either Obama or Clinton against the presumptive GOP nominee.

 “It appears that much of the GOP hope that Democrats will remain divided after the nomination process is over may be wishful thinking on their part,” de Berge wrote in an analysis.

The real campaign in Arizona will be for the votes of registered independents. McCain polls slightly ahead of the Democrats among independents, with a 2-percentage point advantage against Obama and a 3-percentage point lead against Clinton.

However, independents comprise a disproportionately large segment of the undecided voters. A full 16 percent of independents have yet to decide in a McCain-Obama race, while an even greater 23 percent have to make a choice in a McCain-Clinton race.\

The survey of 630 registered voters was conducted by Phoenix-based Behavior Research Center, a nonpartisan polling firm, from May 12 through 20. It had a margin of error of 4 percentage points, according to the pollsters.

John McCain trumps Democrats in Arizona survey

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008 by Paul Giblin

John McCain

Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain would beat either of his Democratic opponents by fair margins in his home state, according to a statewide survey released Tuesday, April 29.

In a hypothetical head-to-head race against Sen. Barack Obama, the results were: McCain 47 percent, Obama 38 percent, and undecided 15 percent, according the poll conducted by Arizona State University/KAET-TV (Channel 8). That gives the home-state candidate a 9 percentage point edge.

In a head-to-head contest with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, the results were: McCain 53 percent, Clinton 37 percent, and undecided 10 percent. That gives McCain an even more comfortable advantage of 16 percentage points.

The survey-takers probed further and identified the top reasons the respondents sided with their candidate. A sizable portion of the electorate apparently plans to vote against a particular candidate, rather than vote for a candidate.

For example, in the McCain-Obama race, the top three reasons voters said they were supporting McCain were: 1) They don’t like Obama, which turned up 22 percent of the time; 2) They always vote for the Republican candidate, at 20 percent; and, 3) McCain’s experience, 15 percent.

In the same McCain-Obama match-up, the top reasons respondents cited for favoring Obama were: 1) They always vote for the Democratic, which was important for 37 percent; 2) Obama’s message for hope and change, 16 percent; and, 3) They don’t like McCain, 14 percent.

In a McCain-Clinton race, the top reasons for supporting McCain were: 1) They don’t like Clinton, 45 percent; 2) They vote Republican, 18 percent; and, 3) They don’t like Bill Clinton and don’t want another Clinton in the White House, 8 percent.

Also in a McCain-Clinton race, the top reasons respondents told pollsters they selected Clinton were: 1) They vote Democrat, 31 percent; 2) Clinton will change President Bush’s policies and supporting working people, 15 percent; and tied for, 3) Clinton’s against the war in Iraq, and they like her stands on the issues, at 10 percent each.

Poll director Bruce Merrill said there are two reasons Obama did better than Clinton in the head-on-head contests with McCain.

“First, those who identify themselves as political independents divide their vote almost equally between Obama and McCain. Many independents are strongly opposed to the war in Iraq and they tend to oppose (McCain) on that issue,” Merrill said in a prepared statement.

“The second reason Obama does better than Clinton is that Arizonans simply have a strong dislike for Hillary Clinton, even though her husband won the state when he ran for reelection,” he said.

Well, some Arizonans have a strong dislike for her. Clinton beat Obama in Arizona’s Democratic presidential preference election 50.4 percent to 42.4 on Feb. 5, so she has her in-state support group as well.

Interestingly, age, gender and race appear to be only minor considerations for most voters, according to the survey. Or, perhaps, few people admit to pollsters that those factors are important to them.

Either way, among Obama supporters, just 4 percent said they supported him because he’s younger than McCain; while among Clinton supporters, the age issue didn’t register at all. Among McCain supporters, 3 percent said they supported him because he’s older than Obama. McCain supporters didn’t mention age when he was matched up against Clinton.

Regarding gender, 5 percent of Clinton’s followers cited her gender as their top reason to support her; while among McCain supporters, 2 percent cited Clinton’s gender as a reason to vote against her.

Race didn’t show up as a factor in any of the potential match-ups. The independent survey of 577 registered voters statewide was conducted between April 24 and 47. It has a margin of error of 4.0 percentage points, according to the pollsters.  

Arizona’s delegation scores in ‘Power Rankings’

Monday, March 3rd, 2008 by Paul Giblin

Congress.org’s latest annual Power Rankings of the members of Congress provides some interesting talking points concerning Arizona’s 10 member delegation.

First a little background: The deep thinkers behind the rankings score each member on a number of factors, including position, indirect influence, legislative activity, earmark passage and “sizzle/fizzle.”

Clearly, nearly all of that is subjective. For example, racking up federal expenditures for earmarks is considered a positive factor in the rankings. Congress.org’s deep thinkers associate earmark passage with political influence. Sure, there’s an argument to be made for that.

Of course, other deep thinkers associate earmark passage with self indulgence, wasteful spending and stains on congressional records. So, what of Sen. John McCain, and Reps. Jeff Flake and John Shadegg who specifically don’t request earmarks? The Power Rankings knock their scores for that. 

Furthermore, Democrats get an automatic edge because they comprise the majority party in both the Senate and House and as a result will score higher in the position and legislative activity categories. That’s to be expected.

So with that preamble…

On the Senate side, Congress.org ranked Republicans McCain is 10th and Jon Kyl 18th, or second and third overall among Republicans. Interestingly, McCain’s presidential rivals Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barak Obama place ninth and 11th in the Senate respectively.

Congress.org attributes McCain’s ranking in part to position as a ranking party member of a committee, his frequent media coverage, positive sizzle and for successfully amending bills.

He’s knocked for running for higher office, because doing so allegedly reduces or defuses his power to help current constituents. Other deep thinkers could offer the argument that emerging as his party’s nominee for president may give him a certain amount of added clout, but, of course, it’s Congress.org’s rankings so their deep thinkers get the final word.

Kyl should climb in coming years with the real and perceived power associated with his new No. 2 position in the GOP leadership team.

On the House side, Congress.org ranked Democrat Ed Pastor 84th; Republican Shadegg 211th, Democrats Raul Grijalva 246th, Gabrielle Giffords 277th and Harry Mitchell 334th; and Republicans Jeff Flake 372nd, Trent Franks 387th and Rick Renzi dead last at 435th.

Also of note, Renzi was the only member in either the Senate or House to get a negative score.

Ron Paul cashes in on GOP club’s poll

Friday, January 11th, 2008 by Paul Giblin

Ron Paul

Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul has surged to a devastating lead in Arizona, far outdistancing John McCain and all other challengers, just three weeks before the state’s presidential preference election, according to a straw poll of GOP yuppies conducted in a Scottsdale bar during happy Thursday night.

Seasoned political analysts associated with the Republican Professional Club noted their straw poll was something less than perfectly scientific – and only partly because they sold the 515 ballots used in the poll for $5 each.

Nonetheless, here are the, ahem, official results:

– Ron Paul, 80 percent.

– John McCain, 12 percent.

Mitt Romney, 3 percent.

Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson and blank ballots, 1 percent each.

Mike Huckabee, Duncan Hunter and two people whose driver’s licences reveal them to be Charles Jensen and John Galt, 0.5 percent each. 

The only definitive aspect of the pay-per-skew poll is that it raised $2,575 for the club. 

Fred Thompson’s secret campaign strategy

Friday, November 30th, 2007 by Paul Giblin

Fred Thompson

Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson had some fun Thursday when reporters in
Phoenix asked him about the strategy behind a TV commercial that was broadcast during the CNN/YouTube debate on Wednesday.

“Oh, it’s a very secret strategy. I can’t let you in on it,” he said during a brief press conference after speaking at two fundraisers.

All the candidates who participated in the debate were permitted to submit YouTube-style videos to be broadcast during the program. All but Thompson submitted videos that focused on their own achievements and qualifications.

Thompson’s spot instead showed old clips of Mitt Romney defending abortion rights and Mike Huckabee saying tax increases were fine with him. Alas, now Romney is opposed to abortion, and Huckabee is against tax raises.

Thompson said his ad took a legitimate look at his rivals’ evolving position on important issues. “The question is: Do you look at their record for several years or do you look at what they’re saying now, in order to determine what they’re going to do in the future?” Thompson said.

The answer was not provided during the press conference. On another topic, a reporter also asked Thompson if he expected to win Arizona’s GOP presidential preference election on Feb. 5.

“Ah, yes,” he replied without elaborating.

Pulling that off will require plenty of secret strategy work. A poll released by Behavior Research Center earlier this month had Thompson running in fourth place among the GOP presidential candidates in Arizona. The survey had Rudy Giuliani first with 20 percent support among self-identified Republican heads of households. Arizona Sen. John McCain was second at 18 percent, while Romney was third at 11 percent. Thompson was next at 10 percent.

My full story on Thompson’s first campaign visit to Arizona is available here: Posted in Fred Thompson, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giulani, Surveys, polls and guesses, VIPs in AZ | 1 Comment »

John McCain falls behind Rudy Giuliani in Arizona

Tuesday, November 20th, 2007 by Paul Giblin

John McCain

Matt Salmon’s observation last week that John McCain was going to have to fight to win the Republican presidential nomination in Arizona proved to be prophetic.

A Rocky Mountain Poll released Monday showed Rudy Giuliani has edged ahead of McCain among GOP voters. The margin was two percentage points, which is within the poll’s margin of error, but still…

Salmon is McCain’s Arizona campaign co-chairman.

The entire story about Giuliani leapfrogging Arizona’s favorite son ran in Tuesday’s East Valley Tribune. The article also can be accessed here: Posted in John McCain, Rudy Giulani, Surveys, polls and guesses | Comments Off

Think tank deems Mitchell and Giffords moderates

Monday, November 12th, 2007 by Paul Giblin

Harry Mitchell, No. 221½.

Democrat Reps. Harry Mitchell and Gabrielle Giffords have established themselves as true moderates during their first six months in the U.S. House, according to an op-ed piece headlined “For Freshmen, Fresh Voting,” by John Fortier, a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank.

In fact, Fortier writes that he was surprised to find that most of the freshman Democrats in the House are voting on the conservative side of their party. “None of the 30 Democrats who replaced Republicans are among the most liberal 20 percent of Congress,” Fortier writes.

Fortier bases his findings on Voteview, a statistical rating compiled by political scientists Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal, who have been in the congressional ranking business for decades. Their latest rankings are based on the House members’ voting records during the first six months of 2007.

Fortier compares the new Democrats’ voting records against their Republican predecessors’ records. “Among the biggest changes, J.D. Hayworth, R-Ariz., and Chris Chocola, R-Ind., who had voting records among the 10 percent most conservatives, have been replaced by Harry Mitchell, D, and Joe Donnelly, D, respectively, who rank almost exactly in the middle of the 110th Congress,” Fortier writes.

A little background is in order here. Voteview ranks all 435 members of the House each session, though Poole told me the rankings frequently include more than 435 spots to account for representatives who serve part of their terms, leave office and are replaced by others.

The most liberal representative is assigned the rank of 1. The most conservative representative is assigned the rank of 435, or higher if circumstances dictate. Using that scale, here’s how the
Arizona delegation ranked during the first half of 2007:

Raul Grijalva, Democrat, tied with four others for 26½.

Ed Pastor, Democrat, tied with nine others for 77½.

Gabrielle Giffords, Democrat, 219.

Harry Mitchell, Democrat, tied with one other for 221½.

Rick Renzi, Republican, 261.

Trent Franks, Republican, 426.

John Shadegg, Republican, 432.

Jeff Flake, Republican, 433.

Statistically, the middle of the pack is 217½, so both Giffords and Mitchell fell into the conservative half of both the Democrats and the entire House. Another interesting note is that the latest Voteview rankings only had 434 spots because of ties, so Flake was the second-most conservative at 433, while Shadegg was the third-most conservative at 432. The most conservative spot was held, as it has been for the past several years, by presidential candidate Ron Paul, R-Texas.

Poole told me the rankings are based on an optimal classification algorithm, which I suppose means something to people who know what that means. “It’s one of those things where the reason why it’s not out there more in the mass press … is our method is based upon statistical basis that are not real easy to explain, but are far more precise than all those other ways to measure,” he said.

I’ll take his word for it.

Anyway, Fortier’s piece is available here: www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,publD.27087/pub_detail.asp

The Voteview rankings and more background on the researchers’ optimal classification algorithm are available here: www.voteview.com

The 60-second presidential race

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007 by Paul Giblin

Speed politics

ABC News potentially could put thousands image makers and journalists out of work with its 2008 presidential Match-o-Matic, an Internet devise that blends the concepts of politics and on-line dating, which sounds a whole lot worse than it actually is.

Would-be voters can use Match-o-Matic to identify their top three presidential candidates in about 60 seconds. It works this way: Users take an 11-question survey on the Iraq war, healthcare, immigration, gay marriage and a few other topics. The survey offers four to six answers for each question. (In some instances though, I wished it offered at least one more option.)

At the conclusion of the quiz portion, Match-o-Matic sifts through the policy positions of the 17 announced presidential candidates in both political parties and spits out the top three candidates based on each survey-taker’s responses, with no regard for the candidates’ charisma or checkbooks. In addition, the site provides quotes or background information from or about about the selected candidates concerning each of the 11 topics.

Tucson blogger Tom Dunn, who writes ThinkRight Arizona, discovered Match-o-Matic and gave it a test drive. He said it ranked Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Fred Thompson as his blog’s top three choices.

Match-o-Matic can be accessed here: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/page?id=3623346.

Dunn’s blog, which comments on politics from a Republican point of view, can be accessed here: Posted in Hard to classify, John McCain, Rudy Giulani, Surveys, polls and guesses, The news biz | Comments Off

Arizona voters declare their independence

Monday, October 29th, 2007 by Paul Giblin

Jan Brewer

Arizona voters are turning their backs to the state’s three recognized political parties in greater numbers than ever before. New voters are registering as independents at more than twice the rate Democrats, Republicans and Libertarians combined.

Overall, nearly 35,400 new voters registered during the third quarter of the year. Here’s the Arizona Secretary of State’s breakdown of their party preferences:

Independent – 58.6 percent

Democrat – 33 percent

Republican – 8.5 percent

Libertarian – negative less than 1 percent – meaning fewer Libertarians joined the ranks of new voters than existing Libertarian voters were purged from voter rolls.

Secretary of State Jan Brewer expects the voters registering as Dems, Reps and Libs will surge shortly. “As we get closer to the presidential preference elections in 2008 where only those voters registered with a specific political party can participate, I have no doubt that we will see party registration significantly climb,” she said in a press release.

“I feel confident that the voter outreach efforts of my office, the county recorders, the political parties, and the candidates themselves will also lead to voter interest as we get closer to the 2008 election cycle,” she said.

So far though, just the opposite is happening. Nearly 39,800 new voters registered during the second quarter. Here’s the breakdown of how they registered:

Independent – 53 percent

Democrat – 36 percent

Republican – 11 percent

Libertarian – less than 1 percent

So for the third quarter, the numbers showed a decrease of about 3 percentage points for Democrats, a drop of 2½ percent for Republicans and decrease of 1 percentage point for Libertarians. Yet voters who registered as “none of the above” increased more than 5½ percentage points.

The trend seems to indicate that new voters are more interested in staying outside of the parties than they are in voting in the parties’ presidential preference elections. The Arizona presidential preference election is set for Feb. 5, so the fourth quarter voter registration results should tell the true story.

Voters tab McCain and Clinton

Thursday, September 27th, 2007 by Paul Giblin

John McCain and Hilliary Clinton

Presidential hopefuls John McCain and Hillary Clinton are tops among Arizona voters in their respective parties, according to Bruce Merrill and his team of pollsters at Arizona State University and KAET-TV Channel 8.

Here’s the breakdown among Republicans: McCain at 27 percent, Rudy Giuliani at 22 percent, Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney at 17 percent each, and Newt Gingrich at 8 percent. Undecided came in at 9 percent.

Here’s how it stakes up among Democrats: Clinton at 38 percent, Al Gore and Barack Obama at 18 percent each, John Edwards at 10 percent, and Bill Richardson at 5 percent. Undecided was 11 percent.

Overall, McCain is still lack-luster among Republicans in his home state. Consider this: While McCain is getting 27 percent support, the anybody-who-isn’t-McCain candidates are getting a combined 64 percent support.

“Sen. McCain probably has a slight lead in the Arizona Republican primary race, but he shouldn’t and probably won’t take the state for granted,” Merrill said. “After the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries, I think you’ll see the senator spend more time in the state and his numbers will improve.”

On the Democratic side, Clinton is an interesting candidate, Merrill said. “Voters either love her or hate her. She has very high negatives and it will be interesting to see how many Democrats who say they don’t like her will still vote for her.”

The only candidates have spent any quality time campaigning in Arizona, McCain and Romney, aren’t exactly lighting up the electorate. McCain, as we discussed, is only at 27 percent, while Romney is doing even further back at 17 percent.

To be fair though, Giuliani, Edwards and Richardson also have made campaign swings through the state. And Giuliani is likely to come back at any time to restock his Adam Sandler DVD collection.

Also interestingly, former Vice President Gore is tied for second on the donkey side, which is remarkable for a non-candidate who keeps insisting he isn’t running.

ADVERTISEMENT